MLS Polls
Login Form
Who's Online
We have 4 guests onlineFeatured Sponsors
| Unfiltered Thinking: Beckham, Donovan, MLS Cup 2009 |
|
|
| MLS News | |||||
| Monday, 23 November 2009 15:13 | |||||
|
When writing about a game that involves a team I support, I like to take the approach of looking at the cup as being both half-full and half-empty. As a (mostly) non-partisan observer for MLS Cup, I didnât want to pollute this blog with such thinking.
(I am, however, surprised that I havenât yet seen an overtime/penalty-related headline somewhere about how âThe Cup Runneth Overâ . . . )Â
Instead, here are some largely unfiltered thoughts on yesterdayâs MLS Cup.  It was a Cup Final: Last nightâs game was not filled with particularly pretty soccer nor as many goal-mouth chances as Iâd like to see, but this is what Cup finals are often like. What was noticeable . . . players cared. Players played sick. Players tried to play hurt. Fans watched. (Actually I donât know that anybody watched, but I can hope.)  Counter âthisâ: I was lightly supporting RSL over LA last night, mostly because I like the approach Jason Kreis takes (âHeâs making an offensive sub so early, what about penalties? Go Jason!â) and as a sentimental vote for ex-Rev Andy Williams, who I always liked and whose personal/family story was so compelling this year. What solidified my support for RSL was this . . . they held the ball, they tried to play on the ground, they wanted to play soccer. LA never seemed quite capable of that, despite Donovan and Beckhamâs presence. They appeared to be content to try to win by striking on the quick counter. While possibly effective, it is not my favorite style.  Penalties: Most people start their rant with âwhat a terrible way to end a gameâ . . . fine. Whatâs the realistic alternative? The players were dead-tired and the soccer was beginning to suffer greatly. Penalties are certainly dramatic, require some level of skill and provide a chance to feed the U.S. fixation on goalkeepers (more on that below.) I donât know a better reasonable solution.  Beckham: Frankly, I am glad his team lost. This is not because Iâm anti-Beckham. In fact, I think MLS is better with him in it than without him. However, what I like is that this loss helps the MLS marketing department write the storyline around Beckhamâs âunfinished businessâ to create some drama after his Milan loan draws to a close.  (Too bad he doesnât have a deep evil voiceâquite the opposite, in factâor he could have stormed off with an Arnold-esque âIâll be backâ snarl.)  Landon: The contrast of the first goalâs pin-point cross from the wing to his missed penalty and absentee performance past the 45-minute mark pretty much sums up the confusion MLS and U.S. fans have about Landon Donovan. It will certainly add fuel to the "Landycakes" fire anyway. Is he a World Class player whose absence from the U.S. National Team makes them bland and boring? Is he a player who only really shows well in less-meaningful games and fades away when it matters most? Like with my view on Becks, part of me was happy that Landonâs team lost. I like the idea of a ticked-off Landon with something to prove taking the field in South Africa for the U.S. What I worry about is the reverseâsome odd crisis of confidence that affects his decision-making and his next steps for his club future.  M.V.P.: I like Nick Rimando. Both last night and the Chicago game show that he seems good at stopping penalties. But I must admit it really bothers me when a goalkeeperâany goalkeeperâgets an MVP award. I much prefer a field player gets it and in this game, Iâd say Kyle Beckerman was probably worthy. I doubt most âsoccer expertsâ would really argue this anti-goalkeeper stance, but thereâs a continual need to pretend a U.S. soccer fan couldnât notice a good performance that didnât directly result in one or more goals. *Note: Beckermanâs hair may have removed him from eligibility for the MVP award. Only the other Beck(ham) can be a super-star/sex symbol while having absolutely ridiculous hair. And Beckham clearly wasnât going to win anything last night . . .  Field Turf: I have mixed emotions on this. The purist in me says a final should never be on turf. Well, actually, the purist in me says a professional game should never be on turf. (I may have turned off the TV if there were football lines, so at least that was addressed.) However, there is a piece of me that also wants to say this. SHUT UP. âThat injury only would happen on turf.â Maybe. âYou can see the affect of the turf on that play.â Maybe. Both teams played on the same pitch. Both knew what type of surface theyâd be on. Both had some amount of time to practice. Once the game starts, please just LET IT GO. Alternatively, weâd be hearing about the injury that only happened because of the divot in the grass or the pass that didnât get completed due to the mud puddle. PLAY THE GAME. Letâs rid the game of turf if possible (thanks Toronto!) but letâs deal with it until that day.  So that wraps up MLS 2009. It's time to start watching the Collective Bargaining Agreement hyperbole that we will all be bombarded with and see if we can cut through the malarkey that gets spewed from both sides. Read more MLS news on BleacherReport.com Source: Click Here
Only registered users can write comments!
3.26 Copyright (C) 2008 Compojoom.com / Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved." |


